»Ê¼Ò»ªÈË

XClose

The Constitution Unit

Home
Menu

Dr Renwick gives evidence to the DCMS Sub-committee on Online Harms and Disinformation

28 September 2021

The Constitution Unit’s Deputy Director, Dr Alan Renwick, gave evidence to the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Sub-committee on Online Harms and Disinformation on 23 September regarding the government’s proposed Online Safety Bill.Ìý

Alan Renwick speaking with the DCMS sub committee about online harms and disinformation

On 23 September Dr Alan Renwick gave evidence to theÌýÌýalongside LordÌýPuttmanÌýCBE, Chair of the Democracy and Digital Technologies Committee in the House of Lords; and Dr Talita de Souza Dias Shaw, Foundation Junior Research Fellow in Law, Jesus College, University of Oxford.ÌýÌý

Commenting on the government’s proposed bill, Dr Renwick argued that the omission of provisions to protectÌýdemocracyÌýagainst misinformationÌýis a serious concern.ÌýThisÌýissueÌýwas identified as aÌýpriorityÌýissue in the original Online Harms White Paper, published in 2019,Ìýbut has since beenÌýdroppedÌýfrom theÌýplans. Misleading and false information can lead to greater public distrust in democracy and itsÌýinstitutions,Ìýso it is important that there is a duty on digitalÌýplatformsÌýto not amplify false content which is harmful to democracy.ÌýWhile freedom of speech is fundamental to democracy and is rightfully protected in the bill, Alan Renwick argued, people should equally be protected from the dangers of misinformation.ÌýTheÌýbill needs to find aÌýbetterÌýbalance between these two principles of democracy.Ìý

Building on the findings of the Unit reportÌýDoing Democracy Better,ÌýDr Renwick suggested three ways to tackle misinformation which could be included in the bill. First, measures that seek to directly address misinformation online, such as removing particular content, adjusting algorithms so that misinformation and disinformation isÌýless prominent, and rigorous fact-checking of material by politically impartial and independent organisations. Second, measures to promote media literacy among the population:ÌýwhileÌýthese areÌýmentioned in the bill, detail is light, and it is difficult to see what shape such interventions will take. Third, ensuring that good quality, accurate information is available so that voters can make an informed choice at the ballot box.Ìý

Dr Renwick highlighted the importance of protecting democratic processes from disproportionate influence by ministers. Clause 33 of the bill gives the Secretary of State the power to direct changes in codes of practiceÌýissued byÌýthe regulator, Ofcom, to ensure that the codesÌýreflect government policy. The government, heÌýsaid, shouldn’t have such influence over the regulator. Dr Renwick recommended that parliament should set outÌýtheÌýframeworkÌýin primary legislation so that it can be properly scrutinised,ÌýandÌýthat OfcomÌýthenÌýoperatesÌýindependentlyÌýwithinÌýthatÌýframework. Important matters relating to democracy receive insufficient discussion in parliament: theÌýdraft bill is the first time in 18 years such legislationÌýon communicationsÌýhas gone through parliament.Ìý

Key linksÌý

  • Watch theÌý.
  • Read Alan Renwick’sÌý, jointly written with Alex Walker.Ìý
  • Read Unit report,ÌýDoing Democracy Better.Ìý
  • Alan Renwick is currently leading a research project examining attitudes to democracy in the UK.ÌýFind out more.Ìý
  • which looked at the government's planned reform to electoral law, including some of the aforementioned issues with the Online Safty Bill. You can also l on our podcast.Ìý